Bible Believer TUBE
Falling Even Harder
Updated: Sep 12, 2022
Believe it or not, I've sat on this post (well, everything under the the big = ) for a year, being convicted by the Lord every time I went into my drafts thinking about posting it. (I've about 12 posts sitting yet, unpublished, its just how I do things) It only dawned on me when the media fantastically kicked off about a certain eastern European civil war that what I had long suspected was right, timed at the at the exact same time Matt Crane considered it openly here. <- Sermonaudio link to the series banned by youtube
Basically it is the apparent fact that the Lord, in his mercy as he wants none to perish (1 Tim 2.4) is setting up the types (Ecc 1.9) of tribulation horsemen, right before he releases the 'real deal', as Its already pricking people at how bad the actual tribulation period will be. (I say this as one guy I'm dealing with personally is under conviction right now, over the head of imagining what inflation will be like with having to deal with a mark on top of it)
What got me thinking about that scenario since I posted deification last year was:
And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.
Bow = NHS rainbows and Corona means crown and that thing sure conquered. Then I realized the 'm' in 'mRNA' meant 'messenger' and as John went before Jesus (Mal 3.1), I assume now a messenger would need to go before Judas as a counterfeit.
So I thought 'Uh oh. is God doing a full dress rehearsal?' and now I see the media suddenly talk about a war (Rev 6.4-6) thats being going on since 2014 and major sanctions and worldwide repercussions follow? and people start to suddenly care? Are you surprised by that 2014 statement reader? see here
Isn' it strange how people only care about that war, 8 years in, when the news medias need a quick shift away from 'freedom convoys' and yet no preacher will say about the Colombia, Myanmar, and Syrian bloody civil wars, or the current South Sudan ethnic cleaning? no? just the war the news wants you to talk about? IS THAT HOW BAD THE MINDS OF THE PEOPLE ARE CONTROLLED?? why didnt anybody behind pulpits mentioning Ukraine last week have a gander at
before asking for prayers for 'peace' like any pope would?
Be careful of any church suddenly talking like a news channel. More on that at the bottom of this post.
Now before I go further, as the reader, programmed by the TV may have emotionally reacted already rather than think logically. Calm down and read on. This post isnt pro Russian, nor pro Ukrainian. (and I wont let any news media force me to 'pick a side')
nor am I saying that
people arent being hurt or that wicked things arent happening over there. #5 on my list mentions the missionaries in that predicament. Im sitting in the western-most corner of Europe, and have nothing to deal with either nation. However as a bible believing Christian I can see a few things forming, despite Psalm 131.1 still being very much the case. these things are;
2 The ability to pick an enemy that gets braindead members of society (Isa 32.5-8) to foam at the mouth over in hatred
3 Extreme sentences for criticizing governments
4. Gods joke on bleeding-heart-liberals
5. The orthodox anti proselyting laws
but can ye not discern the signs of the times?
I'll break each down.
The gold standard returns in the tribulation, via a cryptocurrency pegged to it means the petrodollar is kaput (watch videos below for how close that is) this is proven in James 5:3 (as any athiest will tell you 'gold cant canker nor rust, thats what makes it precious'), as its the mark that is pegged to the standard that 'eats the flesh' via Rev 16.2. I also believe that James 5.4 shows the trade in physical gold and silver that can be used to pay unmarked labour.
^ those 2 articles are a glimpse of the tribulation.
^ The first 4 minutes of that last video sums up whats going to be the result of both sides. There's more info in those videos there than in a years worth of news reports. Then pray over Rev 6.5-6 being typified before we go at the rapture.
2 The ability to pick an enemy that gets braindead members of society (Isa 32.5-8) to foam at the mouth over in hatred
This leads to the tribulation saints getting ritually sacrificed, (Psalm 141.6-10) if you think this is extreme and it'd take a long time to get there, remember in 2016 (when God started to turn his attention back to Israel) since Trump appeared the media has had spirits in it dishing out the wicked idea that certain folk who are perceived to be the enemy can be attacked in a socially acceptable manner. Trump supporters, then the unmasked, then the unvaccinated, now Russians. It's hurtling towards Christians and Jews.
3 Extreme sentences for criticizing governments
Your telling me in just the past week three different countries done this just at random? what about Canada or Australia? are they next?
4. Gods joke on bleeding-heart-liberals
I also will laugh at your calamity;
I will mock when your fear cometh;
Might be quite the surprise to some readers but the crowd that are in Hollywood and the news media 'standing with the people of Ukraine' such as Michael Douglas and other such cretins are standing with Neo-Nazi militias that the CIA installed when they toppled the government over in 2014. Dont believe me? then gander at the crowd thats defending the 2 declared republics between Russia and Ukraine where all the fighting is!
They are the
^Go on! click and see who is defending Ukraine from Russia! Go give to them when your local bleeding heart coming around looking charity money to send to the 'ukrainan conflict'! (Ive already had this)
This wee guy is right, and so much for 'democracy'
Matt Cranes the only one I know of who has mentioned this, as I linked to at the top of the page.
Even Israel asked them not to keep funding neo nazi groups here
Justin Trudeau (of all people) funded them too
5. The orthodox anti proselyting laws
Only Justin Childers has mentioned it so far, that I know of, and its a scary one if that spreads, especially if connected to #3:
Now with that out of the road, lets move on to the post thats finally came out of storage!
Sadly another follow up to Falling for it and deification <- click
And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter.
Yea, the stork in the heaven knoweth her appointed times; and the turtle and the crane and the swallow observe the time of their coming; but my people know not the judgment of the Lord. How do ye say, We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us? Lo, certainly in vain made he it; the pen of the scribes is in vain. The wise men are ashamed, they are dismayed and taken: lo, they have rejected the word of the Lord; and what wisdom is in them?
Anarcho-tyranny: A stage of governmental dysfunction in which the state is anarchically hopeless at coping with large matters but ruthlessly tyrannical in the enforcement of small ones. Anarcho-tyranny is a concept, where the state is argued to be more interested in controlling citizens so that they do not oppose the managerial class (tyranny) rather than controlling real criminals (causing anarchy). Laws are argued to be enforced only selectively, depending on what is perceived to be beneficial for the ruling elite (Samuel T. Francis)
^ The modern west
I write this this as the strangest thing is still continuing in local churches which frustrates me no end, purely based on the fact on my complete inability to see things from their perspective, and to try to give myself a satisfactory answer that lets me understand the motivational thought processes to come up with such a BLIND and STUPID notion.
This notion was surmised in the description of this video -
The next stage of Alexandrian blindness is the complete worship of the state (Ezek 14.1-11, Eph 4.18) in their deception (based on carnal comfort at all costs - Rom 8.7, Psalm 122.7) they believe the state has the citizens best interests at heart and as such throw out any evidence to the contrary with the notion of it being a 'conspiracy theory'. (A term coined by CIA of course - https://projectunspeakable.com/conspiracy-theory-invention-of-cia/)
They forget Satan is in controls of all kingdoms on earth (Matt 4.8-9, Rev 11.15)
I believe everybody that's guilty of such wilful ignorance is described in Proverbs 29:12.
The Alexandrians and Pharisees reading this will scoff at it as accurately as Heb 3.12 describes them.
As current events are wrapping up the church age quite clearly to anyone with a drop of spiritual discernment (wearing something on your face to shop? & scanning a wristband to enter a concert? etc) there's still this blinded (Rev 3.17) mindset that 'its OK, the government are the good guys.. all is well, nothing to see here' as the house burns around them. I do believe its comfort worship, as moneys the idol that keeps it going, and its UNCOMFORTABLE to think about your 'protectors' being the bad guys,
especially the boomer generation who were taught (aggressively through state pushed 'patriotism') that the new babel builders saved everybody's day in WW2 and prosperity that followed was all their doing.
ANYHOW the point of this post is to remind Christians who mock the 10th and 16th appendixes in the Ruckman Reference Bible (out of fear and willful ignorance) that the notion (which I HONESTLY heard come literally out of a pulpit) was "conspiracies cant be true as if they were, our government would admit them to us" That statement (aimed at me personally in typical laodicean passive-aggressive effeminate manner) inspired this post.
So thanks to Bill Gradys masterpiece "How Satan Turned America Against God (Understanding the Times Vol 1)" which I've just finished reading, I got the idea to list what our nice, honest, rulers have actually said about such things.
Because remember, its only true if the state admits it!
So lets hear them then, in their own words:
Benjamin Disraeli in the House of Commons, July 14, 1856
"There is in Italy a power which we seldom mention in this House... I mean
the secret societies.... It is useless to deny, because it is impossible to conceal,
that a great part of Europe-the whole of Italy and France and a great portion
of Germany, to say nothing of other countries-is covered with a network of
those secret societies, just as the superficies of the earth is now being covered
with railroads. And what are their objects? They do not attempt to conceal
them. They do not want constitutional government: they do not want ameliorated
institutions... they want to change the tenure of land, to drive out the
present owners of the soil and to put an end to ecclesiastical establishments.
Some of them may go further..."
Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberg meeting at Evian, France, May 21, 1992
Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether teal or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.
I have heard much of the nefarious, & dangerous plan, & doctrines of the Illuminati, but never saw the Book until you were pleased to send it to me. The same causes which have prevented my acknowledging the receipt of your letter, have prevented my reading the Book, hitherto; namely—the multiplicity of matters which pressed upon me before, & the debilitated state in which I was left after, a severe fever had been removed. And which allows me to add little more now, than thanks for your kind wishes and favourable sentiments, except to correct an error you have run into, of my Presiding over the English lodges in this Country. The fact is, I preside over none, nor have I been in one more than once or twice, within the last thirty years. I believe notwithstandings, that none of the Lodges in this Country are contaminated with the principles ascribed to the Society of the Illuminati.
“Finally, in conclusion, we can trace the foundation of three secret societies, in fact the most influential three secret societies that we know about, to Universities. The Illuminati was founded at University of Ingolstadt. The Group was founded at All Souls College, Oxford University in England, and The Order was founded at Yale University in the United States. The paradox is that institutions supposedly devoted to the search for truth and freedom have given birth to institutions devoted to world enslavement.”
“Some well read readers may raise a question -- how does The Order and its families relate to Cecil Rhodes' secret society, Milners Round Table, the Illuminati and the Jewish secret society equivalents? How do these fit into the picture?
We are concerned here only with the core of a purely American phenomenon with German origin. It is undoubtedly linked to overseas groups. The links between The Order and Britain go through Lazard Freres and the private merchant bankers. ** Notably **the British establishment was also founded at a University -- Oxford University, and especially All Souls College at Oxford. The British element is called "The Group."
The Group links to the Jewish equivalent through the Rothschilds in Britain (Lord Rothschild was an original member of Rhodes' "inner circle"). The Order in the U.S. links to the Guggenheim, Schiff and Warburg families. There were no Jews at all in The Order until very recently. In fact, The Order has, as Rosenbaum suggests, some definite anti-semetic tendencies. Token Jews (and token blacks) have been admitted in recent years. There is an Illuminati connection. Some details are in the Esquire article, more details will be in our future volumes.
All these groups have cooperative and competitive features. But to argue that all the world's ills can be ascribed to any one of these groups is false. The core of The Order, like the core of "The Group" in England, comprises about 20 families. In the U.S. case they are mostly descendents from the original settlers in Massachusetts. New wealth did not enter The Order until the mid-19th century and until recently, has never dominated The Order. On the other hand, key families, the Whitneys and the Harrimans, are linked to their own banking interests.
In many ways these old line Yankee families have outsmarted the bankers. The Puritans diverted bankers' wealth to their own objectives without always absorbing the banker families. The Order controls the substantial wealth of Andrew Carnegie, but no Carnegie has ever been a member of The Order. The Order used the Ford wealth so flagrantly against the wishes of the Ford family that two Fords resigned from the board of the Ford Foundation. No Ford has been a member of The Order. The name Morgan has never appeared on the membership lists, although some Morgan partners are with the inner core, for example, Davison and Perkins. Interestingly, the Astor name is prominent in "The Group" in England, but not in The Order in the U.S.”
“The Masonic fraternity tramples upon our rights, defeats the administration of justice, and bids defiance to every government which it cannot control.”
Richard Nixon Apr 1980
The nation's immediate problem is that while the common man fights America's wars, the intellectual elite sets its agenda.
George H. W. Bush, Televised address, September 11, 1990.
Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective— a new world order— can emerge.... We are now in sight of a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.”
In the 21st century your generation must also lead the challenge of an international financial system that has no respect for national borders.
Strobe Talbot, Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State quoted in Time magazine on July 20, 1992:
In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea.
Woodrow Wilson 1913
(If he truly felt this way, why did he create the Federal Reserve? He was a willing dupe. This book was probably telling people what they wanted to hear while he did the opposite.)
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something.
They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.
They know that America is not a place of which it can be said, as it used to be, that a man may choose his own calling and pursue it just as far as his abilities enable him to pursue it; because to-day, if he enters certain fields, there are organizations which will use means against him that will prevent his building up a business which they do not want to have built up; organizations that will see to it that the ground is cut from under him and the markets shut against him. For if he begins to sell to certain retail dealers, to any retail dealers, the monopoly will refuse to sell to those dealers, and those dealers, afraid, will not buy the new man's wares.”
If the American people could learn what I know of the fierce hatred of the priests of Rome against our institutions, our schools, our most sacred rights, and our so dearly bought liberties, they would drive them out as traitors. (I suppose he knew because the war of northern aggression led to Romes rule over the US)
1834 report by Massachusetts house of reps on freemasonry
If the American people could learn what I know of the fierce hatred of the priests of Rome against our institutions, our schools, our most sacred rights, and our so dearly bought liberties, they would drive them out as traitors.
its secrecy, and the oaths and regulations which its subjects are bound to obey, under penalties of death, have occupied much of the attention of the Committee, in
connection with the third branch of their inquiry. In order to present this view of the subject in definite form, it is necessary to give an outline of the organization of Freemasonry, as the Committee understand it to exist in this country.
This information authorizes, in their opinion, the following conclusions
First. That Freemasonry is moral evil; inasmuch as it holds its proceedings shrouded by cautious and almost impenetrable secrecy, and at an hour of darkness, which
withdraws its members, unseasonably, from that family circle, which ought to be the first care and the first solace of every good citizen; as it offers temptations in
the form of refreshments,” to departure from that sobriety and temperance, which should mark the character of an intelligent and moral community; as it familiarizes
the mind, theoretically at least, to the contemplation of scenes of violence and blood and especially as some of its rites and ceremonies are offensively sacrilegious, profaning what the community generally religiously respect; thus undermining those sentiments of piety, which are acknowledged to be the very basis and safeguard of morality.
Second. That Freemasonry is pecuniary evil; inasmuch as it collects from the community, under the false pretences of extensive charity and peculiar science, large amounts of money, which are afterwards chiefly expended in unprofitable entertainments, parades, and trinkets, which, in the language of an eminent departed statesman, well-informed savage wou'd blush to wear.”
Third. That Freemasonry is political evil; inasmuch as it is government claiming existence independent of civil governments, and administering oaths, which, from
their number and frequency, tend to impair the binding force of civil oaths—threaten penalties, severe even to barbarity, and calculated to have an appalling and controlling effect on weak and uninformed minds—and in
their tenor conflict with the civil obligations of the citizen, calling on him either to violate the latter in obedience to his Masonic oaths, or to violate his Masonic oaths in obedience to his civil obligations.
Margaret Thatcher 1997 Dec 10, Lecture to the Heritage Foundation
Today's international policy makers have succumbed to a liberal contagion whose most alarming symptom is to view any new and artificial structure as preferable to a traditional and tested one. So they forget that it was powerful nation states, drawing on national loyalties and national armies, which enforced UN Security Council Resolutions and defeated Iraq in 1991. Their (international policy makers') short term goal is to subordinate American and other national sovereignties to multi-lateral authorities; their long term goal, one suspects, is to establish the UN as a kind of embryo world government.
Samuel FB Morse
We cannot be too often reminded of the double character of the enemy who has trained
foothold upon our shores ; for although Popery is a religious sect, and on this ground claims toleration side by side with other religious sects, yet Popery is also a political, a despotic system, which we must repel as altogether incompatible
with the existence of freedom. I repeat it, Popery is a political, a despotic system which must be resisted by all true patriots.
John D. Rockefeller
′We will keep them alive for a short time, we will weaken their minds while we pretend to be the opposite.
We will use knowledge of science and technology in a delicate way to never see what happens.
We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and soothing in food and water and air. Wherever they go, they will be covered in poison.
Soft metal makes them lose their mind. We promise to find medicine from many of our foundations, but in the meantime we give them more poison.
Chemical poisons are absorbed through the skin of idiots who think certain great actors and musicians hygiene and beauty products bring eternal youth to their face and bodies, destroying their minds and internal organs through their thirsty and hungry mouths, the reproduction.
You will continue to prosper from their wars and deaths.
We will repeat this until we reach our final goal.
We will continue to keep them in fear and anger, give them pictures and voices. We will use all tools to achieve this.
We provide tools through their work. We will make them hate themselves and their neighbours.
We will always hide the divine truth from them that we are all one. They should never know this!
They should never know that colors are just illusions, they must always believe that they are not equal. We will reach our goal by drop.
We will take their lands, resources, and assets so that we can exercise complete control over them.
We deceive them into passing laws that steal the little freedom they have. We set up a money system that destroys them forever, keeping them and their children in debt.
When we block them together, we will charge them with murder and present another story to the world because we will be the owners of all media.
We will use the media to flow information and control their emotions to our benefit. When they rebel against us, we trample them like insects because they are less than that.
The Net Zero: principles for successful behaviour change initiatives research paper stated:
Government statements, actions and laws powerfully shape perceptions of normative and acceptable behaviour. For instance, even with public criticism being high, many still perceived government approval as the yardstick for safe behaviour during COVID-19 ‘we’re allowed to do this now [so must be safe]…’. This reveals, for many, a deep set reverence for legitimate government authority, regardless of one’s personal political views.
(Reverence, thats a strange term to choose isnt it? Im told to revere somebody in the bible and it isn't the state - Luke 20:13, Hebrews 12:28)
In all, the report found the British public — and people in general — did what they were told by the government, “have a powerful tendency to conform”, can be “nudged” into making government-approved decisions, and, where all else fails, tend to accept the new status quo when changes are forced, even if they were unwanted by the public in the first place.
The review of the effectiveness of government moving to control and change public behavior during the coronavirus pandemic came in a report produced for the Department for Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) by the Behavioral Insights Team (BIT). Best known as the ‘nudge’ unit, the BIT was established in the Cabinet Office during the David Cameron era and was tasked with fine-tuning government policy to make public acceptance and uptake of initiatives as high as possible.
The BIT emphasises behavioural economics and moving away from old-school government lecturing of the public on what decisions to make, towards fundamentally changing the options available to the public to choose from in the first place. This, it claims, is much more effective, contrasting a failed 30 years of the government telling people to exercise more and eat less with the recent sugar tax — highly approved of by BIT — which saw the consumption of sugary drinks plummet in months.
After the document was deleted from the British government website, a state spokesman played down the importance of the paper, emphasising that it was “an academic research paper, not government policy”. While BIT was founded as a government body, it was partially privatised in 2014 and now presents itself as an ordinary company, although it is in fact part-owned by the British state and still does the majority of its work for the British government.
Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours team, which found in its research on how to increase adherence to instructions that:
[A] substantial number of people still do not feel sufficiently personally threatened [by Covid-19]… The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging. To be effective this must also empower people by making clear the actions they can take to reduce the threat.
With this wickedness being put out openly from the UK government, where then does the spirit come from that makes Christian churches speak these lines?
(Hint: its found in Rev 16.14)
"it is our Christian duty to uphold the Lord’s clear instruction in Matthew 22:39 that we should love our neighbour as ourselves. Being confronted with a health crisis that has affected our congregations, we must exercise a duty of care toward our own church members and toward society in general.... "
"...To proclaim the message of God’s love for sinners in both common and saving grace and then fail to act responsibly in taking all necessary measures to protect them in the face of this virus would be sheer hypocrisy..." hmmm sounds familiar
"...In Romans 13 we are taught by the Spirit of God to obey the civil government He has placed over us. The UK Government in seeking to prevent the spread of the virus has issued a call to various groupings, including churches, to cease public gatherings."
This same government, yeah?
SIDE NOTE: Isn't it odd during this time every politician was behind a pulpit in front of the camera? what, you say, it was so he could read his notes? then I ask, are they only back to using teleprompters now? I know this - when a man stands behind a 'pulpit' hes trying to push a spirit out onto his congregation. (That's why the modern 'hip' churches chuck them out - spiritual darkness [Isa 8.20]) What spirits then were these characters putting out? (1 Tim 4.1, Rev 16.14)
Back on topic:
and my personal favorite I heard locally, a real showstopper on the matter -
"...When Moses received the Ten Commandments the Bible says his face shined brightly because he'd spent time in God's presence. In fact, it shone so brightly that he had to mask his face to protect the Israelites. So don't worry about it, you should wear one too!"
On that note, hows quoting 2 Chronicles 7:14 incessantly working out for you?
Don't all those Christian statements remind you of something?
A wicked doer giveth heed to false lips; and a liar giveth ear to a naughty tongue.
But strong meat belongeth to them that are of full age, even those who by reason of use have their senses exercised to discern both good and evil.
For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
Two secular quotes Ive found to end with:
Covid is a new religion. No doubt about that. I increasingly believe it is the religion of the antichrist and the NWO. Man is no longer precious because made in the image of God,* but is turned into a dangerous pathogen carrier that needs to be genetically modified, constantly tested for dreaded disease that has a 99.7% survival rate, and muzzled so as to make him no longer fully human. Belief in "science" and the government has taken the place of belief in God. This is a very evil and satanic religion.
(*Yes the image of God thing is off doctrinally, but he makes a good point)
Not evidence of conspiracy, but I don’t believe in coincidences.
A global pandemic from a ‘virus’ conveniently released from ‘A’ Lab, that shrinks the global economy pushing divisions between the empire & its competitors China & Russia. Priming the western peasantry for curfews (lockdowns) food shortages, limitations on travel, a global recession & war. Surprisingly, Russia invades Ukraine! The west reacts, imposing sanctions that will almost certainly cause a global depression, with a socioeconomic breakdown of Eastern Europe. Enabling an economic reset & digital currency."
"In any case, the “Great Reset” (Click here) was intended to transition to a new form of capitalism: surveillance capitalism. In other words, a kind of capitalism whose driving force was the monetization of data collected by surveilling the behavior of citizens, who would receive nothing in return for supplying capital with all this valuable information.
Surveillance capitalism is built on a digital foundation. After all, the more digitized the world becomes, the more data is produced by people, the more opportunities arise to monetize the data.
The holy grail of data collection has long been a universal digital ID that could be identified across different channels, from websites to mobile phones to apps, etc. Your data consolidated into a singular profile."
Why, I do believe that is Rev 13.16-18 verbatim.